It often comes down to what gets through the filter of the American media. To be fair, the United States is hardly unique in this.  Few countries engage in serious introspection about their actions.  However, there often seems to be a major disconnect between American self-image and the image as seen abroad.

To some extent it is understandable.  Self-criticism is too hard to take and certain groups can often go too overboard on the critiques of America without acknowledging the good.  But too often the American media goes to the other extreme by embracing the Pollyannaish version of American exceptionalism (like the ridiculous George W. Bush assertion “they hate us for our freedoms“) in which all American foreign policy actions are undertaken for noble reasons.  As many Latin Americans would tell you, that has unfortunately not always been the case.

A column by Juan Cole brought this issue up for me recently.  The column deals with the continuing human catastrophe in Gaza.  Israel’s apologists in the United States often attribute any criticism of Israel to an undercurrent of anti-semitism and are only too willing to grant it unquestioned support.  However, it is stories like the one linked above that have undercut the sympathy Israel attracts (including among some progressives in the United States) in many parts of the world.

Israel is no longer the plucky underdog of the Six Days War or the Yom Kippur War threatened by seemingly overwhelming odds.  While the threat to Israel is real, the armies of its Arab neighbors have atrophied since the fall of the Soviet Union.  Meanwhile the Israeli army built up with a steady diet of American aid is the 800 lb gorilla in the Middle East.  Add to that the (not publicly acknowledged, but understood) second strike nuclear capability delivered to Israel by the United States and Israel has the ability to pulverize any of its neighbors (as Lebanon and the Gaza strip found out in the last two years).

However, with great power comes great responsibility.  American media coverage generally fails  to acknowledge this change in status for Israel or the extremely disproportionate number of Palestinian casualties in the last decade.  American media has also not really delved into the details of the collective punishment inflicted on Gaza in the past year.  When the destruction is covered, it is generally framed solely in the context of a response to terrorist attacks with little discussion of whether a hammer is being used to swat a fly.  As a result, the United States remains one of the few countries where public opinion and elected officials generally uncritically support Israel.

In contrast, the rest of the world’s media has covered this issue extensively.  So now a furious and sometimes bewildered Israel finds much of world opinion treating it as a bully for actions it feels are justified self-defense.  Israel is also painfully learning the lesson the United States learned in Vietnam.  Civilian suffering transmitted to the living rooms makes for awful public relations for a democracy, unless of course the media chooses not to cover it.  It is unfair, but countries are generally held to higher standards than terrorist groups.

A critique I have had for the Cheneyian vision of the world is that it often seeks to lower American actions to the standards of the thugs they oppose while encouraging charges of hypocrisy by maintaining the high minded rhetoric that plays so well domestically.  Israel does have a point that it should not have to take too many pious bromides from human rights “paragons” Syria, Saudi Arabia, Iran, etc. who are only too willing to use the Palestinians as props while doing nothing to ameliorate their lot.  However, the question does arise whether Israel really wants to lump itself on the issue of human rights with these countries?

Juan Cole’s column also brought about a sense of deja vu.  The stories about Gaza sound distressingly similar to the stories about the sufferings of Iraqi civilians during the sanctions in the 1990s.  These stories were circulated by human rights groups, dismissed by the Clinton and Bush administrations as solely Saddam Hussein’s fault and were largely ignored by the media.  While nobody should discount Saddam’s brutality, hiding behind indifference of a tyrant to the suffering of his people is an odd way to absolve yourself of any responsibility.  And ultimately all that suffering made not a whit of difference to toppling his regime.  As the Iranian people are finding out and as the Chinese found in 1989, public outrage by itself cannot topple men with the guns who have no qualms about shedding blood.  It is also very easy, as in the case of Iraq, for governments used to manipulating public opinion to transfer the blame to the people implementing the sanctions.

The result is a propaganda coup for the regime (another example would be Castro’s dictatorship in Cuba that blames the yanquis for the failures of its socialist revolution) and a recruiting boon for fanatics like Al Qaeda who tap into the resentment caused by the suffering that is transmitted into living rooms across the Middle East.

However, as little of this is transmitted to American living rooms the perspective of the American public is shaped very differently than the rest of the world.

Subscribe to Rashtrakut by Email

Follow Rashtrakut on Twitter

(5) Comments   


[…] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Aditya Kane and Evi Indrawanto, Rashtrakut. Rashtrakut said: From the blog: Why does so much of the world see things differently than #America? […]

Ross Molho on 30 January, 2010 at 10:30 pm #

Whether Americans are getting the “straight” story on the Israeli/Palestinian issue from their media is beside the point. Americans get it right when they throw their weight or bias behind Israel and not the Palestinians and their sympathizers. Like it or not, Israel is the only democracy in the Mideast. The Palestinians in Gaza have been victimized by so many other forces other than the Israelis, such as the Egyptians and Muslim fundamentalism, and their own sorry leadership, as much as they have been victimized by the Isreaelis.

Bottom line is that if Mexico sent rockets into Nogales or El Paso every now and then, and refused to acknowledge the U.S.’right to exist than you’d see some pretty strong retaliation on the part of the United States akin to swatting a fly with a hammer.

Rashtrakut on 31 January, 2010 at 2:59 pm #

So because the Palestinians have also been victimized by their leaders and their own leadership and because Israel is a democracy, it gets a free pass on how it treats the Palestinians? If there is outrage at the rockets (and there should be) shouldn’t there be some for using airplanes to bomb urban areas where civilians reside? Why is Israel entitled to a deference never given to any other American ally?

Ross Molho on 14 February, 2010 at 7:33 pm #

I’m not sure Israel has gotten a free pass on how it treated Gaza civilians. Perhaps now I’m changing the argument but the fact of the matter is that the Mideast is a “rough neighborhood.” Israel should be held to high standards because it is a democracy and because it receives significant American aid. Still, in 1982, as Rashtrakut knows, the Syrians leveled Hamah, killing between 10 and 25k civilians while they bombed urban areas and the only way I ever learned about it was through Thomas Friedman’s book.

Rashtrakut on 14 February, 2010 at 8:53 pm #

I don’t think the Syrians have exactly got a free pass on Hama (which I have noted many times in the blog when I refer to Iran). That said the Syrian attack on Hama itself is part of a double standard because of who the Syrians killed. Western governments were not shedding too many tears for the dead Islamists of the Muslim Brotherhood. Likewise, Saddam Hussein’s poison gas attack on the Kurds at Halabja got coverage in the press but a muted response from Washington because he was also gassing the Iranians at the same time. However, there is also a difference between not calling out Syria and Iraq, vs. absolving Israel for any action that some would like to do. I agree, Israel is in a rough neighborhood and the fact that many of the people hurling darts have very unclean hands of their own. You might find this article from the Democracy in America blog a good read as well.

Post a Comment